|
Box 1:

Example for Tetraplegia ASIA B sub C5/C6 and loss of muscle functions and sensitivity.
|
 |
The patient must overcome significant obstacles to interact with his or her environment and is often dependent upon others to accomplish everyday activities. Learning to cope with this situation is a complex process that affects a patient’s quality of life.3 How a person deals with a condition such as tetraplegia may play a significant role in the true benefits of even proven surgical and medical interventions.
For instance, one accepted procedure — upper extremity surgery — has been shown to greatly improve the functioning of the hand and arm in persons suffering from tetraplegia4 5, resulting in positive life impacts, improvements in activities of daily living, increased independence and better quality of life.6
|
|
Box 2:

Upper Extremity Surgery Used for the Improvement of Functioning in Tetraplegia
|
 |
However, surgery and its associated post-operative management alone may not guarantee positive results, and the rehabilitative process that follows must include the patient’s individual perspective in order to maximize his or her actual benefits.7 8 9 In fact, a focus on "person-centered service" is increasingly emphasized in the field of rehabilitation management.10
This case study aims to illustrate a key challenge and opportunity in translating the potential of such a beneficial procedure into positive, meaningful outcomes for an individual patient.
|